Archive for the ‘Gadgets’ Category

The Wireless Extension Cord

Thursday, October 30th, 2008

I was looking for a surge protector with an extra-long cord for a project at work, and bumped into this doozy at ThinkGeek; a wireless extension cord!

With tongue planted firmly in cheek, they describe the gadget thusly:

Just plug the Wireless Extension Cord (WEC) base unit into a standard wall outlet, and plug whatever you need into the satellite unit. The WEC uses microwaves in the 7.2GHz range, so it won’t interfere with wireless networks, Bluetooth components, etc. Now, all you need to do is adjust the antennae on the two units so they are aimed at each other. Turn everything on and you have the power! The distance the WEC units can broadcast differs from situation to situation (due to interference of such things as walls, power lines, and microwave ovens), but we’ve beamed power over 300 feet! The future is wireless – and the WEC’s are your ticket to the future.

The best part is the Warning:

Warning: Even though these microwaves are about as harmful as the leakage from an ordinary microwave oven (not much), do not put computers, televisions, other sensitive electrical equipment, food, liquids, paper, glass, flammable substances, magnets, or living things in between the base and satellite units. Just in case.

If only…

The Trials & Tribulations Of Building An E-Bike On The Cheap

Sunday, June 15th, 2008

Last fall I finally broke down and bought an electric conversion kit for my bike. Getting there was a long process because the CFO (aka: the Wife) wasn’t terribly excited about the idea, so funding for it was very spotty. A bonus at work finally provided the cash needed for the motor, and I was on my way.

I had checked out lots of different hubs, including the GoHub that I wrote about a while back, and settled on a rear wheel hub motor manufactured & sold by Golden Motor.
ebike_hub_sm.jpg

In retrospect, the decision to go with the Golden hub was probably a poor one. The design of the motor itself is reportedly pretty decent, and my experience with it on the road is positive, but reports from users on their user’s forum show that the product quality from Golden is very inconsistent; most work well, but a sizable (and what most would consider unacceptable) percentage have serious issues, and service is about as bad as it gets. That means it’s nonexistent. Orders are handled by way of email and PayPal transactions, and the primary sales contact — Philip — is in China; messages to him go unanswered for way too long, if they get answered at all. About the only communication I received from him is when I actually placed an order for the motor; all the pre- and post-sales emails I’ve sent to him have been ignored. The best support for the product comes via the user’s forum, but that’s of pretty limited usefulness as there is absolutely no official presence there from Golden Motor. There are some knowledgeable, helpful individuals on the forum giving good information on occasion, but I’d much prefer someone on the inside keeping things humming.

I picked the Golden Motor hub mainly because of price; $265 shipped — far less expensive than most others. When I first found them earlier last summer, the kit was $175 plus shipping, but with the weight of the kit, I’m sure shipping was fairly expensive; not $90 expensive, but… I really shouldn’t complain though. Now the price has jumped to $338 shipped. Guess the weak dollar has really taken its toll.

After placing my order, I didn’t expect to see the hub for a while — reports on the forum pegged delivery to be measured in weeks — but it turned out that the longest delay was getting PayPal to transfer the cash to Golden. After they got my money the hub kit was shipped from a distributor in California (I think) and I got it within a few days. Apparently things are improving on that front.

From what I read on the user’s forum, most hub motors sold are for front wheel installations. That kit seems to be well engineered and goes on the bike pretty easily. But the rear wheel kit… that’s pretty much a work in progress. I went with the rear hub thinking that it would give me the best flexibility for mounting it on other bikes, especially with the rowtrike/rowbike the boys and I are hoping to build in mind. After making that decision and placing my order, one issue that came to my attention is that the rear hubs required 160mm between the rear dropouts. I planed to mount the motor on my ProFlex mountain bike, which has a standard rear axle width of 135mm. If I did nothing to narrow the hub I’d need to spread the dropouts to add 25mm between the dropouts. That’s just under an inch, which may be a bit much. But when the motor arrived, the story was different.

Others who had bough the rear hubs before reported that they had threads on both sides; the right side for the freewheel of course, and the left with matching threads for a brake. The hubs were originally designed for scooters in China, which use a band brake on the left side. Generally, band brakes are used on scooters and other small-wheeled contrivances; on a 26″ bike wheel, the torque is too much for the band brake to handle, and makes it pretty much worthless for stopping power. But the hub I received had threads only on the right side, for the freewheel. That made the width of the hub less of an issue, but I had a few other issues that I still needed to deal with.

The first order of business was to fabricate a new set of spacers for the axle that left enough room on the right for the freewheel. The spacers are short bits of steel tubing that fit between the bearing races and the bike frame dropouts. My motor appears to be one of the transitional iterations that was only half done right, and the spacers that were included were far too short to be of any use. I first measured the width of the hub, from the outsides of the two bearings and subtracted that from the space between the dropouts. I measured the depth of the freewheel and added a bit to that for the right side spacer, then used the remainder of the room available for the left.

Problem number two was with the axle. The axle has flats ground on them which holds the axle in place and allows the torque to be transferred to the ground instead of spinning the axle inside the hub. The axle flats were cut as if this hub still had the threaded cover on the left side — transitional species again. So I had to grind down the round part of the axle to extend the flats to where the dropout would hit it. You can see in the photo that even then, the threads don’t go far enough toward the center of the wheel, so I have to add a washer outside the dropout to keep the wheel on.

axle_left_side.jpg

The problem I then encountered was the rim; the wheel was built with the rim centered on the hub, so with the freewheel on the right, the hub — and the rim — was off center by about an inch.

off-center.jpg

I took the wheel to Spoke n Sport to have them dish it; I don’t have a truing stand, and I’ve only built two wheels in my entire life, so I thought they could do it much better than I. Turned out they could only move the rim about 5mm toward the freewheel side because the spokes on the other side were running out of threads. Dang. Not sure if buying longer spoke nipples is an option or what, but it’s still not where I need it. I went ahead and mounted the wheel on the bike, then adjusted the brakes to get them to work. It works, but I don’t much like the arrangement and will be swapping in a different rim properly dished sometime soon.

ebike_sm.jpg

One option that I had thought of earlier, but may end up just doing is to build a new rear triangle for the ProFlex specifically for the electric hub; one that pushes the wheel backward six inches or so to make room for batteries between the wheel and downtube, similar to the rear triangle on the Liberty Electric Bike. That idea comes in part from the XtraCycle FreeRadical and the Stoke Monkey; in fact a home-built version of that made from the rear triangle of a scrapped frame might be just the ticket. Hmmm… That’s got possibilities. I’ve been trying to scrounge up some old bike frames for the job, but most everything is just junk bikes, so I may have to get a little more sophisticated than Freecycle or thrift stores. Mainly what I’m looking for is a dropout that has a real derailleur hanger on it; I would think that something like that would be easier to come by, but…

My bike is a ProFlex 872, and the rear triangle is composed of a pair of beefy chainstays on a pivot just above the crank, with a smaller diameter set of seat stays attached to an elastomer shock just below the intersection of the seatpost and top tube. If I build a new rear triangle to supplant the original to make space behind the seat tube for mounting batteries down low, it will also make room for a real shock absorber for the rear wheel. The funky elastomer shocks on ProFlex bikes never lasted long, and with the demise of the manufacturer, replacement elastomers are hard to find — mine is long gone, replaced with a chunk of rubber designed for an automotive application, so it doesn’t have much give. It would be really nice to have a real shock in there!

I ordered a set of three 12 volt, 7 amp/hour sealed lead acid batteries from Rage Battery for it, again being budget conscious in that decision. I put the batteries in an old trunk pack that on hand, setting that on an aluminum rack on the back of the bike. The controller was mounted to a small piece of plywood cut to fit inside a nylon bag that hangs from the top tube. Maybe when I get around to building the new rear triangle I’ll include room for the controller in there as well. The bag works ok, but it could be much better. Some of the other bikes built by Golden Motor buyers have some goofy looking controller installations, and I think mine is a bit cleaner looking. I might be compromising airflow around the controller a bit, but I don’t think heat has been much of an issue thus far.

The biggest problem in using the bike so far this year has been the weather. We’ve had an unusually long, cold & wet spring. Mechanically, the bike has worked well for the first 100 miles. I have been able to use the bike to get to work and back with little effort… Riding the bike is like, well, riding a bike. Except riding with the motor feels like you’re always going downhill. Without pedaling the bike will carry me at a pretty steady 18mph. If I pedal a bit it’s possible to kick it up to about 25mph, but the biggest restriction there seems to be gearing — I can’t spin much faster than that. I’m thinking about putting a bigger chainring on it to increase my top speed.

On the subject of gearing, another modification I’m considering is eliminating the multi-speed rear cluster. I’ve got a bit of a Mickey Mouse shifter arrangement set up for the rear derailleur — and old thumb shifter mounted on the left handlebar — and the result is that I don’t use it much. Most of the shifting is done on the front chainrings. A single speed freewheel on the wheel will make centering the wheel much easier.

One thing that makes riding this bike feel different than a standard bike is out of the seat pedaling. Definitely not recommended. I did that riding up a steep hill last week, and I thought I was going to lose the batteries from the rack. Going up a hill does take a bit of effort; the motor alone isn’t up to the task. But even with a single speed freewheel, even a steep hill should be very doable by dropping down to a smaller chainring.

When riding on the bike trail in Sioux Falls, it’s a kick being able to pass others so easily; makes you feel like Superman! I was riding it home one day last week, and there was a nasty crosswind. Other cyclists were struggling to keep going at about 10mph; I was able to maintain the usual 18-20mph with no trouble, so I flew by the others. So all in all, I think the project has been a success.

Update: The bike worked great until this week. I hopped on it yesterday morning to go somewhere, and the rear wheel felt funny. I thought it might be low on air, so I turned around to fill it up. While attaching the pump I noticed a problem with one of the spokes…

spoke_hole.jpg

It’s not supposed to look like that. Closer inspection showed that several other spoke holes showed less severe cracking; not a good sign, but not all that unexpected either. The rim that was included with the hub motor was a cheapo single-wall alloy rim, and obviously wasn’t designed for use on such a heavy bike. The motor, batteries, bike and me was a bit too much for it. This situation makes replacing the rim more than a someday thing. I hope to get the wheel dished properly this time; whether that involves buying different spokes or not, I don’t know.

After removing the wheel for closer inspection, it also seems that the wheel doesn’t spin as easily as it did when I first got it. I’ll be removing the motor covers to inspect the bearings to see if there is a problem there. It appears that the wheel spacers have held up well; I was a little concerned about them. Even considering the initial challenges and this most recent setback, I still think the project has been successful. This issue with the rim will indeed be a challenge, but I think the end result will be a better performing product.

Psystar — Still Hopeful

Sunday, April 20th, 2008

crabapple.jpg

Earlier today I checked the Psystar website, and they must’ve been doing some maintenance on the server or changing something with the configuration; got nothing but errors. And the pit in my stomach came back.

It was Sunday, so it wasn’t difficult to put it out of my mind for most of the day. When I checked it again just now; the site is back, with a new post on the front page saying they’ve contracted with a new payment processor with more capacity (… we challenge you, let’s see if we can max this one out.) Last I heard they had switched to PayPal when the original processor dumped them. I went through the order process just for fun, and no sign of PayPal anywhere, just the standard Visa, MasterCard & American Express.

The post also says that they’ve started shipping orders that were placed the week of April 7; that’s funny, I thought they hadn’t started selling until April 14, which is the first day they showed up on the Internet radar and announced that they were building a Mac clone. They say, “We will be shipping units out of our new facility starting Monday, April 21st, including those orders placed the week of April 14th.” I wonder who the lucky recipients of those early shipped machines are. I keep hoping to see something on the net from one of these people, reporting their experience with the machines.

Forbes Magazine has an article containing an interview with Rudy Pedraza. There, he’s being as evasive as usual, but insistent that Psystar is legitimate, and people who have ordered will receive the goods they’ve ordered. The facts of the matter — that the website is still up, still being updated, and orders can be placed — is all a bit reassuring. I’m still a little nervous, but still holding out hope.

And Apple continues to be silent on the whole matter. Hmmm.

The Psystar Saga — Riding It Out

Friday, April 18th, 2008

crabapple.jpgAll the hysteria on Gizmodo and elsewhere over the Psystar saga had me all weirded out yesterday. I was ready to call them up to cancel my order, then take it to the credit card company if they balked.

But then I had a decent night’s sleep, and woke up to see this insightful comment on the Gizmodo thread from commenter AJcorex:

Meh, sounds like it’s just a few guys who’ve tried to make it in the world of sales with little success, found somethin that the world wants, and don’t know how to cope with the demand.

all these blunders could be due to the mass hysteria this has all caused.

I’m waitin it out to see what happens. But this is clearly not the work of any con artists, it’s just too full of doofy errors.

So, so very true. If they were con artists they would’ve,

  1. known that marketing a Mac-compatible clone would generate the attention — & scrutiny — they’re now receiving;
  2. made themselves conveniently unavailable for comment,
  3. been long gone with the money and credit card numbers after only a day or so of business.

So, I think I’ll give Psystar the benefit of the doubt and assume that the business is run by a handful of doofuses who are now struggling with the demand and attention they’ve generated, and the with some of the stupid but well-intentioned blunders they’ve made along the way.

Here’s hoping. Still!

Psystar — The CrabApple That Could

Tuesday, April 15th, 2008

crabapple.jpg

Psystar made a huge splash on the interwebs yesterday by introducing the OpenMac (later renamed “Open Computer” when they realized how badly that would piss off Apple.) The Open is essentially a white box Intel-based computer that can run unmodified OS X Leopard kernels, and can even be ordered with Leopard preinstalled. The computer’s specs match a high-end MacPro pretty closely, but with a base price of $399 (sans OS). Wow! Even with the OS installed (another $155) it’s cheaper than the base Mac mini.

They also sell a higher end machine, the OpenPro, which can be configured with up to 8GB of RAM and 2.6GHz Core2 Quad processors. That one starts at $999, but can go all the way to $2,169 if you check all the boxes. That’s still a far cry from a similarly equipped MacPro.

I think this is a great idea; Apple has a huge untapped market that will not buy or even try the Mac OS because it’s always tied to Apple’s hardware, which in some comparisons appears overpriced. Actually, if you compare apples to apples (pun intended) Apple hardware isn’t that much more expensive than comparable high-end WinTel gear. But the problem is that Apple’s hardware lineup has a huge hole in it that Apple should’ve filled long ago; there is a staggering price difference between the iMac and the MacPro that could be filled with a mid-priced machine with no monitor and a wider range of upgrade options. As it is you’ve got the iMac — which is a great machine, don’t get me wrong — but many PC heads bristle at the thought of an integrated monitor, and they bristle at the thought of the limited upgrade options of the mini. The next option would naturally be the MacPro, but the base price for one is a staggering $2,799. You would think a natural middle ground would be to build a mini-tower, powered like the iMac but sporting three or four PCI slots for upgrades, and room for two or three hard drives and maybe a couple of optical drives. It really wouldn’t be that difficult to pull off, but it would definitely cut into the MacPro sales figures. And the iMac. And the mini. But who cares? They’d be selling computers to people who would otherwise not even consider a Mac.

So, the natural progression here is for a third party to step in and build what Apple will not. That’s where Psystar comes in. And it looks like they have what could be a winner, but their entry starts the race with a huge millstone around it’s neck; Apple’s end user licensing agreement (EULA). Apple’s EULA specifically prohibits running Apple’s OS on anything but Apple’s hardware; you must agree to the EULA before the OS can be installed. That’s a big catch, and considering Steve Jobs’ view on Mac clones, not one that will change anytime soon. So I’m absolutely certain that Psystar has been kept busy with Apple’s legal team for the last 24 hours. Very busy.

I tried to find out what I could about the company, and there really isn’t much out there via a Google search other than what has been published after their Open Computer announcement. Not sure if it’s a new outfit or what. Yesterday the company listed their address as 10645 SW 112th St, Miami, FL, which looks an awful lot like a residential area in Google Maps. But today there is a new address; 10481 NW 28th St, Miami, FL; if you look up that address up in Google Maps, it looks more like light industrial/office. Not sure if that change is comforting or not.

Today’s news says that indeed, Psystar has been dealing with Apple Legal, and they intend to fight. Not sure how far that will go, but it sounds like they are going to proceed with selling computers and the OS package. And they’re being feisty about the upcoming legal battle, citing antitrust violations built into that EULA and charging that Apple marks up their hardware 80 percent. I don’t know how far they’ll get with arguments like that, but I do know they’ve got one heck of an uphill battle ahead of them.

I’m not sure if it was a good idea or not, but last night I went ahead & ordered an Open Computer for work — base machine with Leopard installed for $588 (of the boss’ money!) shipped. We’re in need of updating a few Macs in Prepress anyway, and I figure even if this doesn’t work out, we also need to replace some older PC’s, so I can install Windows on the box and use it elsewhere on the network. And the copy of Leopard won’t go to waste either; I can install that on one of the Macs. $155 is about $30 high for Leopard, but $399 is pretty cheap for a WinTel box spec’d like the Open. So if nothing else, it ought to prove to be a fun experiment.

Now the big question is, will my machine ever ship. And if it ships, how long before I hear from Apple Legal. Time will tell, and I’ll keep posting updates.

Wilcraft Ice Fishing Machine

Monday, February 18th, 2008

I saw an ad for this thing on tv tonight; the Wilcraft ice fishing rig. “Because trucks don’t float.”

wilcraft.jpg

The ad aired during the Kent Hrbek Outdoors Show, and made me laugh out loud. I mean, a purpose-built $10,000 buggy made for rapid deployment for… ice fishermen?

Roll this bad boy off your trailer, drive out to your favorite spot (using your GPS, of course), drop the bottom down on the ice, pop up the tent top, drill a couple of holes and you’re in. Hear about a hot spot somewhere else on the lake? Pull in the lines, drop the tent top, lift the bottom, start the engine, and you’re off in seconds flat. Thin ice in between the spots? No problem. This baby floats. If the snow is deep, all you need is the optional Track System; next best thing to a snow cat.

I think some people have just too much time & money on their hands. How long until we get photos of a redneck-built version, made from a jonboat and an old 4-wheeler?

A New Knife In My Pocket

Thursday, April 19th, 2007

For the last couple of years I’ve carried around a cheapo Chinese-made pocket knife, but as in most things, you get what you pay for in a knife. The one I used to carry — actually the ones, as I bought four of them back then, for about $1 each — had the pocket clip get bent and it didn’t want to stay in my pocket anymore. I tried tapping down the rivet to tighten it up, but tapped a few too many times or too hard and now the blade complains about coming out. As for the others, one has a seriously broken pocket clip, one got stolen out of the Suzuki last week, and I’m not sure where #4 is… Although the serrated blade was decently sharp and could be sharpened up nicely, it just didn’t seem to keep its edge very well. And I never really cared for the serrated blade.

So I broke down the other day & stopped at Ace Hardware to see what they had. I’d normally just browse & pick one that struck my fancy and wasn’t too terribly expensive. But that day the store was nearly empty, and after the guy in the red shirt asked me for the third time if I needed any help, I gave up the thought of dodging him & let him show me his wares.

After telling him what I’d become accustomed to carrying, he pulled out a Kershaw Scallion, a very nifty little knife that snaps open with a flick of the finger, almost like a switchblade. The blade is only 2.25 inches long, but I don’t need anything any longer than that, and the size & weight is just about perfect.

scallion.jpg

But the neatest feature about it is how it opens. You simply flick at a little notch attached to the blade, and “CLICK”; it’s open. Push on the lock and the blade swings shut. I could play with the thing all day it’s so cool. I wasn’t really planning on spending $30-plus on a knife, but this thing was just so impressive. Strange though that Kershaw names its goods after onions; this one is the Scallion, they also have the Leek. I don’t get the connection, but that doesn’t change the fact that I really like this knife.

I bought the one with the plain blade, no serations on it, and it is super sharp. Time will tell how well it holds its edge and how easy it is to sharpen.

Is it worth $30 more than my old knife(s)? Time will tell with that as well I guess, but for now, I’m pleased with my new toy!

Kim Komando

Friday, August 12th, 2005

On many Saturday mornings, I’ll listen to the Kim Komando radio show, where Kim fields calls from computer users with problems. Most of the callers are dealing with Windows problems, and I often get a good laugh out of some of the situations these people wrestle with, because on most occasions there would be no problem if they were using a Mac instead of a PC.

A large portion of the calls are from novice users with virus, worm, or ad-ware problems, or they just need help getting something simple done on their computer. Their Windows computer. And Kim will often end up talking way over their heads, giving some obscure string of commands to fix the problem, and promising to add the issue with thorough instructions to her newsletter.

When a question comes up about a Mac, she’ll often talk about how the issue would be handled on a Windows computer, but rarely gives a decent answer for the Mac user; she usually throws in some snide comment about Macs. When I turned the radio on last Saturday she was talking about Macs, and how one of her former employees — who had moved on to a new job using Macs — had stopped back for a visit. She said that he had told her that Macs aren’t really any easier to use than Windows machines; he said that the Macs that they used for her show worked well because they were well maintained, but the ones at his new job were not and they were anything but reliable. And she used that to back up her disagreement with a caller’s assertion that Macs are easier to use. The only ones who find Macs hard to use are hard-core Windows users. “Don’t throw anything new at me, I know all the ins and outs of Windows, and could care less if there’s an easier & better way!”

Now I don’t fault Kim for being Windows-centric. In fact in her line of work having more users on Windows machines is in her best interest, and it’s even better if they have problems with those Windows machines. It creates more demand for her books and drives more listeners to her show. Macs are a threat to that, plain and simple.

It still drives me just a little nuts listening to it all, and knowing there is a better way.